|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Journal of Adolescent Research, Vol. 12, No. 3,
354-357 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/0743554897123004
Identity Processes
Integrating Social Psychological and Developmental Approaches
Harold D. Grotevant
University of Minnesota
In this article, the Kerpelman, Pittnan, and Lamke (1997) microprocess perspective on identity development is discussed. Comments focus on the role of individual differences and cultural and historical contexts in the model, and questions are raised about the ways in which the model conceptualizes and handles developmental shifts in identity.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Zimmer-Gembeck and J. T. Mortimer
Adolescent Work, Vocational Development, and Education.
Review of Educational Research,
December 1, 2006;
76(4):
537 - 566.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Stueve and J. H. Pleck
'Parenting Voices': Solo Parent Identity and Co-Parent Identities in Married Parents' Narratives of Meaningful Parenting Experiences
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,
October 1, 2001;
18(5):
691 - 708.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. R. Adams
Identity: A Brief Critique of a Cybernetic Model
Journal of Adolescent Research,
July 1, 1997;
12(3):
358 - 362.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Kerpelman, J. F. Pittman, and L. K. Lamke
Revisiting the Identity Control Theory Approach: A Rejoinder
Journal of Adolescent Research,
July 1, 1997;
12(3):
363 - 371.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|
|