Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Adolescent Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Windle, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lerner, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Cross-Cultural Comparability of Temperament among Japanese and American Early- and Late-Adolescents

Michael Windle

Research Institute on Alcoholism

Saburo Iwawaki

Graduate School of Education,Hyogo Kyoiku University

Richard M. Lerner

The Pennsylvania State University

The cross-cultural generalizability of temperament, as measured by the Revised Dimensions of Temperament Survey (DOTS-R) (Windle & Lerner, 1986), was investigated by studying metric equivalent relations between samples of Japanese and American early adolescents, and between samples of Japanese and American late adolescents. Similar to findings for the American adolescent samples, nine-and ten-factor models were found to adequately represent the inter-item covariance matrix of the DOTS-R for the Japanese early and late-adolescents, respectively. Metric equivalence between the early-and late-adolescent samples, respectively, was supported via congruence coefficients and restricted (confirmatory), simultaneous group models for each of the separate temperament dimensions. Statistical tests of differences in factor means were conducted and indicated that American early-and late-adolescents rated themselves higher in approach behavior, mood quality (positive affect), and task orientation. The Japanese early adolescents rated themselves higher with respect to features of behavioral rhythmicity. No statistically significant differences were found for almost one-half of the factor mean comparisons. Proposals for future cross-cultural research in adolescent temperament which move beyond measurement equivalence issues were suggested to address issues of similarities and differences between cultural groups with respect to causal linkages. In addition, we suggest the use of additional methods of measurement conjointly with the DOTS-R in order to triangulate on salient temperament constructs.

Journal of Adolescent Research, Vol. 2, No. 4, 423-446 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/074355488724009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
International Journal of Behavioral DevelopmentHome page
M. A. Gartstein, H. R. Slobodskaya, and I. A. Kinsht
Cross-cultural differences in temperament in the first year of life: United States of America (US) and Russia
International Journal of Behavioral Development, July 1, 2003; 27(4): 316 - 328.
[Abstract] [PDF]