Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Adolescent Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Greene, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bandelow, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Establishing Psychometric Equilibrium: The Balance Puzzle Revised

A. L. Greene

N. Bsharah

D. Bandelow

West Virginia University

The Balance Puzzle is a widely used assessment of proportional reasoning in adolescents and young adults (Linn & Pulos, 1980; 1983a; 1983b; Linn & Swiney, 1981). A primary feature of the task is that it permits identification of strategy use through the incorporation of foils in each of the response choices which accompany the thirteen items of the task. Previous research (Greene, 1986), however, indicated that the proportional reasoning strategies described by Linn and Pulos (1980; 1983) are only inconsistently reflected across item response choices. This paper reports the findings obtained using a revised version of the Balance Puzzle task which corrected these problems in strategy reflection. Two hundred ninety four male and female college students participated in the study. As in previous research (Greene, 1986; in press) no significant sex differences in proportional reasoning or volume conservation were obtained. MANOVA analysis revealed significantly higher total item and strategy use scores on the original than on the revised version of the task. Complementarily, internal consistency reliability, as measured by Cronbach's alpha was higher on the revised than on the original version of the task. Taken together, the findings demonstrate the significant improvements in test discrimination and reliability associated with the revised Balance Puzzle.

Journal of Adolescent Research, Vol. 3, No. 1, 53-63 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/074355488831005


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?