Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Adolescent Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neaves, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Crouch, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Deidentification in Two-Child Families

Rosa D. Neaves

Joyce G. Crouch

Appalachian State University

This study investigated deidentification in relationship to self-ratings, achievement test performance, and grade point average offirst-born and second-born siblings. A sample of 47 adolescent sibling pairs from two-child families rated self and sibling on 13 semantic differential concepts. Results indicated that both first-born and second-born adolescents who judged themselves to be higher achieving that their siblings had higher self-definitions on evaluative and activity scales than did those who judged themselves equally or lower achieving. On achievement measures, however, first-borns who rated themselves as higher achieving than their sibling tended to have significantly higher achievement test scores and higher grade point averages than did other groups, but second-borns tended to have higher scores on these measures when they judged themselves to be equally achieving. These findings were interpreted as support for social comparison theory and as suggesting that intellectual performance may be more salient to first-borns than to second-borns.

Journal of Adolescent Research, Vol. 5, No. 3, 370-386 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/074355489053007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?